Sport in the European Union – at the Crossroads of Competences – Implications of the Application Of Article 165

Main Article Content

Jelena Ćeranić Perišić

Abstract

The European Union acts only within the limits of the competences conferred upon it by the Member States in the Treaties to attain the objectives set out therein. In the field of sport, the Member States did not initially confer any powers to the European Union. Nevertheless, first the European Court of Justice and subsequently the Commission have insisted that in so far as sport constitutes an economic activity it falls within the scope of the Treaty. In order to limit the EU’s interventions in sport, in the mid-90s of the 20th century, sports bodies began to advocate for the inclusion of provisions on sport in the Treaties. Sport was first mentioned in the Lisbon Treaty. This paper attempts to analyze the development of sport and sports law in the EU, which can be divided into three phases. Therefore, first, the practice of the EJC and its most significant judgements are discussed. Then, the Amsterdam and Nice Declarations are presented. These declarations are particularly significant because they emphasize the importance of respecting the specificity of sport as an economic activity. Special attention is paid to the implications of the application of article 165 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Bačić A., Bačić P., „Lisabonski ugovor i novi start europskog sportskog prava“, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 48/2011, 681–702.

Ćeranić J., „Ratifikacija Lisabonskog ugovora – reforma Evropske unije: bilans i perspektive“, Strani pravni život, 3/2009, 7–25.

García B., Weatherill S., “Engaging with the EU in order to minimize its impact: sport and the negotiation of the Treaty of Lisbon”, Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), Routledge, 2012, 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.609710

Hill J., “The European Commission’s White Paper on Sport: a step backwards for specificity?”, International Journal of Sport Policy, Vol. 1, 3/2009, 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940903265533

Miettinen S.M., “The Independent European Sport Review: a critical overview”, International Sports Law Journal, 3-4/2006, 57–62.

Stanić M., „Ključne tačke odnosa komunitarnog prava i fudbala“, Srpski fudbal – uporedno pravni izazovi i perspektive (ur. M. Stanić, D. Šuput), Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd 2021, 99–108.

Šuput D., „Nastajanje sportskog prava Evropske unije“, Strani pravni život, 2/2015, 99–114.

Vukadinović R, Vukadinović Marković J., Uvod u institucije i pravo Evropske unije, Udruženje za evropsko pravo, Kragujevac 2016.

Wathelet M., “L’arrêt Meca-Medina et Majcen: plus qu’un coup dans l’eau”, Revue de Jurisprudence de Liége, Mons et Bruxelles, vol. 113, 41/2006, 1799-1809.

Weatherill S., “Fairness, openness and the specific nature of sport: does the Lisbon Treaty change EU sports law?”, International Sports Law Journal, 3-42010/, 1–6.

Weatherill S., “On overlapping legal orders: what is the purely sporting rule?”, The Regulation of Sport in the EU (eds. B. Bogusz, A. Cygan and E. Szyszczak) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007, 48-73. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847208569.00009

European Commission, Staff Working Document annexed to the White Paper on Sport, COM (2007) 391, 11 July 2007 European Commission, White Paper on Sport, COM (2007) 391 final, 11 July 2007.

Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts, Official Journal C 340, 10.11.1997.

Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007, Official Journal C 306, 17.12.2007.

Treaty of Nice amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts, Official Journal C 80, 10.3.2001.

Evropska komiisja, predmet COMP/37 806: ENIC/ UEFA.

Sud pravde EU, B.N.O. Walrave and L.J.N. Koch v. Association Union cycliste international, predmet br. 36-74, 12. decembar 1974.

Sud pravde EU, David Meca-Medina and Igor Majcen v. Commission of the European Communities, predmet br. C-519/04 P, 18. juli 2006.

Sud pravde EU,Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL v. Jean-Marc Bosman, predmet br. C-415/93, 15. decembar 1995.