The (legal) nature of the acts of the High representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina – (administrative-)legal and/or political
Main Article Content
Abstract
The institution of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina is established by Annex X of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This Annex sets out in detail the issue of status, competencies and objectives, which introduced the High Representative into the constitutional system of Bosnia and Herzegovina. From the primary function conceived by the Dayton Peace Agreement as coordinating, as well as the powers that created the “soft power” of the institution, these powers were over time realized and often accepted as decisive or even commanding in the legal life of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The overriding function of the civilian implementation of the Dayton Peace Agreement was lost in subsequent, “off-Dayton” extensions of the High Representative’s remit. The authors will present the basic institutional physiognomy of the High Representative, and seek to provide an overview of the (legal) nature of the High Representative’s man- date, and in particular the ways in which those powers have been extended and the consequences that this extension caused. During almost three decades of existence in the constitutional system of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the institution of the High Representative has made significant changes to the constitutional and legal regime, which often took on a political dimension. In this regard, the authors will try, within the limits of legal science, to present an overview of the acts of the High Representative, which this institution is authorized to pass according to Dayton, but also all other acts that it passed in the observed period. To date, not only in legal theory, but also in practice, the question of the (legal) nature of the acts of the High Representative, has been rightly raised and thus the possible control of these acts, first of all the constitutional one. Therefore, at this current moment, the authors will try to provide arguments for answering this question, without pretending to provide a final answer at the same time.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Basta Fleiner L. R., "Kako predavati ustavno pravo u dvadeset prvom veku", Novi arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu 1/2021. https://doi.org/10.51204/Novi_Arhiv_PFUB_21103A
Beglerović N., "The Role, Expectations and Challenges of High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina", Politics in Central Europe 18, 3/2022. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2022-0018
Čavoški K., "Svemogući visoki predstavnik", Republika Srpska - deset godina Dejtonskog mirovnog sporazuma (ur. Rajko Kuzmanović), Banja Luka 2005, 297-318.
Dmičić M., Ustavno pravo, dopuna osnovnoj literaturi, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci, Banja Luka 2011.
Ivetić S., Miladinović A., "Policijski sistem BiH - od Dejtona do danas", Dvadeset godina Dejtonskog mirovnog sporazuma (ur. Radomir V. Lukić), Istočno Sarajevo 2017.
Kreća M., Međunarodno javno pravo, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd 2020.
Kunić P., Promjene Ustava Bosne i Hercegovine - pro et contra: kritičke opaske na pojedina institucionalna rješenja: dosadašnja iskustva i moguća rješenja, Banja Luka 2015.
Kuzmanović R., "Narušavanje podjele nadležnosti između entiteta i Bosne i Hercegovine", Podjela nadležnosti između institucija Bosne i Hercegovine i entiteta (ur. Rajko Kuzmanović), Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Republike Srpske, Banja Luka 2000.
Parish M., "The Demise of the Dayton Protectorate", Journal of Intervention and State Building 1/2007, Special Supplement.
Poplašen N., Rušenje Dejtona, Banja Luka 2000.
Ramel S., "Od neokolonijalne Međunarodne zajednice do posthegemone Europe", Status 13/08.
Savić S., Republika Srpska poslije Dejtona, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci, Banja Luka 1999.
Schwarz-Schilling C., Bosnia's Way Forward - Bosnians will soon take over from the international administration, IP Global Issues, Spring, 2006.
Venneri G., "Moddeling states from Brussels? A Critical Assessments of the EU-Driven Statebuilding of Bosnia and Herzegovina", Cyprus Centre for European and International Affairs Paper No. 2007/07.
Vlaški B., Organizacija javne uprave u federalizmu - posebno u Bosni i Hercegovini, doktorska disertacija (neobjavljeno), Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd 2019.
Zeh J., Die Diktatur der Demokraten, Warum ohne Recht keine Staat zu machen ist, Hamburg 2012.
Aćić M., Uloga međunarodnih organizacija u stvaranju i funkcionisanju dejtonske Bosne i Hercegovine, Nezavisni Univerzitet Banja Luka, Banja Luka 2022.
Mojović N., "Promjene ustava via facti", Republika Srpska - deset godina Dejtonskog mirovnog sporazuma, Banja Luka 2005.
Petrič V., Bosna i Hercegovina od Dejtona do Evrope, Svjetlost, Sarajevo 2002.
Pilipović M., Ustav Bosne i Hercegovine. Normativno i stvarno, Pravni fakultet Univerzitet u Banjoj Luci, Banja Luka 2008.
Popović M., "Od konfederalizma ka regionalizmu", Republika Srpska - deset godina Dejtonskog mirovnog sporazuma (ur. Rajko Kuzmanović), Banja Luka 2005.
Tomić Z. R., "Ustavna relativizacija osnovnih ljudskih prava", Preispitivanje klasičnih ustavnopravnih shvatanja u uslovima savremene države i politike (ur. Miroslav Đorđević), Beograd 2021.
http://www.ohr.int/other-doc/un-res-bih/pdf/N0928044.pdf, 26. 11. 2022.
https://press.un.org/en/2021/sc14585 .doc.htm, 26. 11. 2022.
http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/2604, 20. 11. 2022.
http://www.ohr.int/oohr%D1%83/%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82/, 25. 11. 2022.
http://www.ohr.int/decisions-of-the-high-representative/, 26. 11. 2022.
http://www.ohr.int/decision-imposing-the-law-on-state-border-service-3/, 26.11.2022.
http://www.ohr.int/decision-on-the-establishment-of-the-brcko-district-of-bih-3/, 28. 11. 2022.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETqJcr8CFes&ab_channel=Neboj%C5%A1aVukanovi%C4%87, 30. 11. 2022.