The limitation of the data protection right for the purpose of intellectual property rights protection

Main Article Content

Nikola Milosavljević

Abstract

The right to privacy presents one of the most important personal rights as well as strong barrier and the assurance of personal sphere of each of us. Regardless of such importance, the right to privacy cannot and should not be unlimited. Usually, the rights of an individual are limited by the rights of another individual. Hence, it is common to make the balance between the colliding rights and decide which right should prevail. The legal protection of personal data, as a form of privacy, is no exception to that matter, so data protection right can also be limited. Among the other things, it is possible that collision occurs between data protection right of one person and intellectual property rights of another. This is especially feasible, since the intellectual property right holder in civil proceedings can be granted by courts an order for disclosure of information about identity of persons that were involved in the right infringement. The disclosure of personal data of persons involved in infringement could be challenging regarding the data protection right as well as to right to privacy of these persons. Therefore, the author in following paper examines the possibility of limiting the data protection rights for the purpose of protection the intellectual property rights by analyzing the Court of Justice of European Union decisions using the dogmatic and comparative method. The conclusions of this court as well as doctrine could be important for positioning the intellectual property right in legal system and resolving the tension between right on property and right to privacy in this matter.

Article Details

Section
Članci

References

Andonović S., Zaštita podataka u elektronskoj javnoj upravi u Republici Srbiji – pravni aspekti, doktorska disertacija, Pravni Fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd 2019.

Andonović S., Prlјa D., Osnovi prava zaštite podataka o ličnosti, Beograd 2020.

Bentley L., Sherman B., Gangjee D., Johnson P., Intellectual Property Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198769958.001.0001

Beširević V. et al., Komentar Konvencije za zaštitu lјudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, Službeni glasnik, Beograd 2017.

Jovanović Z., Andonović S., Pravo elektronske uprave, Kragujevac 2021.

Krstić I., Marinković T., Evropsko pravo lјudskih prava, Savet Evrope, Kancelarija u Beogradu, Beograd 2016.

Torremans P., Holyoak&Torremans Intelectual property law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198836452.001.0001

Direktiva Evropskog parlamenta i saveta 2004/48/ES od 29. aprila 2004. o sprovođenju zaštite prava intelektualne svojine (Directive 2004/48/ES of the European parliament and of the council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights).

Povelјa o osnovnim pravim Evropske unije (Charter of fundamental Rights of the European Union), 2012/C 326/02.

Presuda Evropskog suda za lјudska prava Niemietz v. Germany, predstavka br. 13710/88, presuda od 23. novembra 1992.

Presuda Evropskog suda za lјudska prava Brüggemann and Scheuten v. SR Germany, predstavka br. 6959/75, presuda od 19. maja 1976.

Presuda Evropskog suda za lјudska prava Leander v. Sweden, predstavka br. 9248/81, presuda od 26. marta 1987.

Presuda Evropskog suda za lјudska prava, Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, predstavka br. 10454/83, presuda od 7. jula 1989.

Presude Suda pravde Evropske unije, Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg, C-580/13 od 16. jula 2015, https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=4834E84E15D132C651EF1AA70657BF2A?text=&docid=165900&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=2741102, jun 2022.

Ustav Republike Srbije, Sl. Glasnik, br. 98/2006-3, 115/2021-3, 16/2022-3.

Zakon o ratifikaciji Evropske konvencije za zaštitu lјudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, izmenjene u skladu sa Protokolom broj 11, Protokola uz Konvenciju za zaštitu lјudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, Protokola broj 4 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu lјudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda kojim se obezbeđuju izvesna prava i slobode koji nisu uklјučeni u Konvenciju i Prvi Protokol uz nju, Protokola broj 6 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu lјudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda o ukidanju smrtne kazne, Protokola broj 7 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu lјudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, Protokola broj 12 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu lјudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda i Protokola broj 13 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu lјudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda o ukidanju smrtne kazne u svim okolnostima, Službeni list SCG – Međunarodni ugovori, br. 9/2003-16 (Službeni list SCG – Međunarodni ugovori, br. 9/2003-16).

Zakon o zaštiti podataka o ličnosti, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 87 od 13. novembra 2018.

The Opinion of Mr. Advocate General Cruz Villalón in Case 580/13 Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg delivered on 16 April 2015, https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=4834E84E15D132C651EF1AA70657BF2A?text=&docid=163726&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=2741102, jun 2022.