The algorithmic discrimination

Main Article Content

Dragan Prlja
Gordana Gasmi
Vanja Korać

Abstract

Algorithmic discrimination can result from the operation of artificial intelligence systems in both the public and private sectors. In the public sector, these are, for example, recommendations for sentencing for criminal offenses, making decisions on pension and social benefits or unemployment benefits, etc. In the private sector, these are decisions that are made in relation to employment, housing, loan approval, pro- duct advertising, etc. Existing legal regulations on non-discrimination and data protection, consumer protection, etc. provide certain opportunities to combat algorithmic discrimination. However, it is certainly necessary to improve these regulations and to adopt new general and sectoral regulations, which will regulate the use of artificial intelligence systems based on algorithmic decision-making, in a safe manner and with a high level of protection of individual rights and freedoms. One of the good solutions for eliminating algorithmic discrimination is that legal regulations require meeting certain conditions and issuing certificates for artificial intelligence systems that are high-risk or that may endanger human rights and freedoms, as provided by the EU Regulation on Artificial Intelligence from 2021.

Article Details

Section
Članci

References

Ben-Israel I. et al., Towards Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Systems: Global perspectives on the development of a legal framework on Artificial Intelligence systems based on the Council of Europe’s standards on human rights, democracy and the rule of law, Council of Europe, 2020, https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/cahai.

Diligenski A., Prlja D., Cerović D., Pravo zaštite podataka GDPR, Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd 2018.

Dimitrijević V., Paunović M., Ljudska prava, Beogradski centar za ljudska prava, Beograd 1997.

European Law Institute, Model Rules on Impact Assessment of Algorithmic Decision Making Systems Used by Public Administration, European Law Institute, Vienna 2022.

Gasmi G., Principi nediskriminacije i savesnog ispunjavanja obaveza država – Teorijski pogled na Istambul Konvenciju Saveta Evrope i praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, Kultura Polisa1/2016.

Prlja D., Pravni ekspertni sistemi, Kompjuteri i pravo 1–2/1993.

Račić O., Milinković B., Paunović M., Ljudska prava – Pet decenija od usvajanja Opšte deklaracije o pravima čoveka, Međunarodna politika, Službeni list SRJ, Pravni fakultet, Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd 1998.

Susskind R., Expert Systems in Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987.

Zuiderveen Borgtesius F., Diskrimination, Artificial Intelligence And Algorithmic Decision-Making, Council of Europe, Strasbourg 2018.

Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin, Official Journal of the European Union L180/2000, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri =celex%3A32000L0043.

European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial intelligence Act) and Amendung Certain Union Legislative Acts, Brussels 21. april 2021. COM(2021) 206 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar: e0649735-a372-11eb-9585-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF.

European Court of Human Rights, Case of Biao v. Denmark, 2016, 38590/10, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre# {%22itemid%22:[%22001-163115%22]}.

Evropska konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, Rim 1950, Službeni list SCG –Međunarodni ugovori 9/2003.

Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), Official Journal of the European Union L 119/2016.