Biopolitics and societies of control: examples from epidemiology and technocracy

Authors

  • Miroslav M. Popović Faculty of Philosophy, University in Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56461/ahilejev_stit.2025.2.07

Keywords:

biopolitics, AIDS wave in the 1980s USA, China's social credit system

Abstract

Biopolitics, in general terms and definitions, refers to mechanisms of control applied over entire populations, including the regulation of births and deaths, population reproduction and fertility, as well as the political application of bioethics and the socio-political consequences of the biotechnological revolution on both society and individual bodies. In this article, we examine biopolitics through two distinct social phenomena: the first is epidemiological, while the second can be described as a system of technocratic control. Both illustrate how biopolitical practices are implemented. The inadequate response of the US government to the first wave of AIDS in the 1980s can be interpreted from a biopolitical perspective, as an attempt to address an emerging public health crisis. Another example is the Chinese state social credit system, which is often associated with dictatorship and population control, regulating citizens' lifestyles, needs, and habits through collected data and algorithmic analysis. These phenomena demonstrate that the application of biopolitical methods, adapted to the technological capabilities of their time, enables states, official institutions, corporations, multinational companies, and other centers of power to pursue their interests - both economic, such as cost- saving and profit-making, and social, such as addressing the needs of marginalized groups.

References

IZVORI

Пешић, Миленко. Кина потписала препоруке УН за забрану оцењивања понашања грађана. Политика. 26. новембар 2021. Преузето са: https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/493129/Kina-potpisala-preporuke-UN-za-zabranu-ocenjivanja-ponasanja-gradana. Датум приступања: 27.3.2025.

Copeland, B. J. Artificial intelligence. Britannica. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence. Accessed 18. 12. 2024.

Mathew, Susan. A Dictionary of Geography (6 ed.). under "biopolitics". Oxford reference. Retrieved from: https://www.oxfordreference.com/search?q=biopolitics&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=true. Accessed 12. 12. 2024.

LITERATURA

Жикић, Бојан. Ризик и порицање: антрополошко проучавање ковида -19 у Србији: 2020- 2022. Београд: Филозофски факултет; Досије студио, 2023.

Кољевић Грифит, Богдана Н. Биополитика XXI века и политички реализам. Sociološki pregled 56. 4 (2022): 1229-1250. https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg56-40750

Bell, Jonathan. Between Private and Public: AIDS, Health Care Capitalism, and the Politics of Respectability in 1980s America. Journal of American Studies (2018): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875818000518

Burgess, Simon. & Wysel, Matthew. China's Social Credit System: How Robust is the Human Rights Critique? In: A. Walsh, and S. Boucher (Ed.), Who's Watching? Surveillance, Big Data and Applied Ethics in the Digital Age (Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, Vol. 26). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2022, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-209620220000026004

Creemers, Rogier. China's Social Credit System: An Evolving Practice of Control. (2018) Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3175792 Accessed 18. 12. 2024.

Darrow, William W. Confronting AIDS in the Early 1980s: Biomedicine, Public Health, and the Fourth Estate. AIDS and Behavior 27 (2023): 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03976-z

Ivanović, Zorica, Šarčević, Predrag. O statusu tela u antropologiji. Kultura 105-106 (2002): 9-24.

Kostka, Genia. China's social credit systems and public opinion: Explaining high levels of approval. New Media & Society 21. 7 (2019): 1565-1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819826402

Liang, Fan. Das, Vishnupriya. Kostyuk, Nadiya. & Hussain, M. Muzammil. Constructing a Data-Driven Society: China's Social Credit System as a State Surveillance Infrastructure. Policy & Internet (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.183

Mitrović, Veselin. Argumenti za i protiv 'poboljšanja' ljudskih bića genetskom intervencijom. Sociologija 52. 2 (2010): 75-96.

Mitrović, Veselin. The Contingency of the 'Enhancement' Arguments. The Possible Transition From Ethical Debate to Social And Political Programs. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies.13. 37 (2014): 93-124.

Published

02-12-2025

Issue

Section

Слика градског, сеоског и пастирског живота : истраживање и грађа